The logical consequences of omnipotence

[Esquilax]

I find your alternative here less satisfying than the weakest Christian apologetics. Ergo, if you can't postulate anything more viable than this reality, then your objection fails.

Ah, you've made the key mistake many theists do, of assuming their opinion about something is more important than the facts about it.

Honestly though, I tried unpacking what you were trying to say here, unsuccessfully. Why am I supposed to care if you find my argument unsatisfying? I notice that you say nothing about why this is so, nor do you propose any form of counter-argument or alternative; why is it left to me to postulate anything, when you won't even provide your objections?

And as Ryantology says, what's your standard for viability? What makes my idea less than viable? How about you work on your own thoughts, before you start baselessly trashing someone else's, hmm? Might make this whole discourse thing go a lot smoother.