The logical consequences of omnipotence

[Esquilax]

Fr0d0, for you:

Ah, you've made the key mistake many theists do, of assuming their opinion about something is more important than the facts about it.

Seriously, you got an issue, take it up with a dictionary, not with me. You want a god that's omnipotent (or "all knowing and all powerful," or any other kind of verbal gymnastics you want to use to avoid the question) then you have to accept the definition of omnipotence. It means that one can achieve anything. It means having unlimited power.

Therefore, I am justified in saying that a god that can do anything has nothing they cannot do. You can bitch about words meaning what they mean all you want, it still doesn't bring your typical theist non-arguments anywhere close to addressing my point.