Another law thread

[Drich]

You ASSUME that one seeks Logic or that one seeks a guide as to how to live one's life. Even in your catch all statement "Neither or both" You are still supposing that the Bible or Christianity is still the means one seeks "Logically or as a guide" to live one's life.

Well it's either logic, not logic, neither or both. Otherwise you're talking too nonsensically so how can you expect to be understood?

The assuption of logic is not the error I am pointing out. It is the assumption that the bible/christianity is logically used to identify a way to live your life.

Again Biblical Christianity is not a way or list of 'logical rules' to live by.

---

No offense taken Rex. Three things to address your valid point, and it is indeed valid.
1. I never mentioned his grammar only his atrocious and constant spelling (since the day he arrived).
2. The word mute was spelled correctly even if I did use the wrong version and thus did not get flagged on a spell check.
3. Most importantly, my original post covers this particular type of mistake:


Everybody makes the occasional spelling/grammar error due to rushing a post or whatever. This guy on the other hand pretends to be some kind of theological/intellectual authority on everything that comes out of his mouth, when in reality he as an uneducated blow hard who can't even put together a legible sentence.

Oh yeah, point definitely taken

(Oh! I wonder how Drich would spell "definitely".)

how it sounds.

---

In that they have been taught to think with in the structured paradyme that states "book learn'n" is the only measure of wisdom and intellegence.

Says the guy whose 'proof' for his faith exists nowhere except in a book.

No, My proof was given to me personally by God. I use "the book" to show you the same promise I used to get the proof I needed. If you want proof simply A/S/K as Christ tells you to in Luke 11.