Re: RE: The logical consequences of omnipotence
January 23, 2013 at 4:43 am
(This post was last modified: January 23, 2013 at 5:00 am by fr0d0.)
(January 23, 2013 at 12:13 am)Celi Wrote: So when you say most atheists are incapable of rational thought, you're 'refraining from torment', whatever that means, but when I said that one possible interpretation of a really vague thing you said is irrational, I'm being intolerant toward you.You made a categoric statement that to have a belief that good wins was irrational. Like an opposite view would be impossible. As I'm stating an opposite view, you are saying that you don't tolerate my view. I never made such an intolerant statement to you. Torment in this case = sarcasm. It never fails to amuse me how atheists always regard themselves so intellectually superior. You say that all atheists are rational, yet I find the majority of atheists to be quite ignorant, not only of religion and the subject they attack without understanding it at all.
(January 23, 2013 at 12:13 am)Celi Wrote: What. Does. That. Mean? Are you being deliberately vague?
No I just have an awkward way of putting things sometimes.
You said something agreeing with people being kind to each other... Interacting positively.
That's similar to the rationale for my world view. But my world view takes it further, because my belief in God as a force for good, means that I am not limited by an end point of nature being neutral. My reasoning end point is a good God.