Re: RE: The logical consequences of omnipotence
January 24, 2013 at 1:46 pm
(This post was last modified: January 24, 2013 at 2:56 pm by fr0d0.)
(January 24, 2013 at 10:42 am)Celi Wrote: You acknowledge that I have the information, but then say that I'm still ignorant because I don't have the knowledge.No. You have the information, but you don't understand it, is what I actually said. You have a problem understanding that??
(January 24, 2013 at 10:42 am)Celi Wrote: my position is logically unsound.
No. You're position is logical. Everything has to add up in your mind or you'd have some serious conflict going on. If you see 3 balls, your logical conclusion would be that there are 3 balls. If, looking at the same scene, I see 5 balls... My logical conclusion would be that there are 5 balls. Two balls are obscured from where you are standing. Logical conclusion in this instance is a matter of perspective. Both of us are right > from our own perspective.
(January 24, 2013 at 10:42 am)Celi Wrote: the first most obvious interpretation I dismissed out of hand was that the world is totally perfectThis was your own invention? I see. I thought you were addressing Christianity. Apologies.