Another law thread

[Esquilax]

You've missed the point of my illustration. If you do not currently involve yourself in and advertise death penality level crimes, you would have fallen into a reality where your soceity has adopted the 'morality' of a verfiable God.

I do not even know what this means.

God says it does. Either one worships God or one is in rebellion. This is illustrated by Christ over and over in his teachings "Wheat/Weeds, Wheat/Chaff, Sheep/Goats" One is either accepted by God or he is not.

Sure, god can say whatever he wants. From a personal standpoint, I can remain ambivalent to him, regardless of whether his existence is proven or not. You say if he did prove himself it would deny free will, and then when I tell you it wouldn't for me, you start talking about what god's thinking, like that at all matters given the example.

Your missing the big picture. This Very thing has happened in two periods of History already. (in two completely different cultures in two different time frames.) The results were the same both times.. How is it you believe despite actual evidence in the Historical record that you know things would work differently?

Because- as my repeated use of the pronoun "I" might have suggested- I was speaking only in personal terms, in response to your original premise. I know what's in my head.

... He said, knowing full well that you're next going to argue that I don't because god.