The logical consequences of omnipotence

[fr0d0]

when really what he's saying just doesn't make sense.

When you get it, I tell you that you get it and you'll say again that you don't get it.

Then you'll make some incomprehensible conclusion and state that you get it, when you don't.

I think there's no hope for you!

it's astoundingly arrogant of you to pity us or assume moral superiority over us just because you have to delude yourself to find happiness.

If you've read what I wrote you'll see that I don't claim any moral superiority. Your bias is strong.

You're still at the beginning of our conversation. You refuse, even tho you demonstrate acceptance of the logical reasoning, to grant me the respect of holding an alternative and viable opinion to yourself. In other words, you are contradicting yourself calling me deluded.

---

How did you gain access to the worldview considering you were an atheist?

I considered the information, trusted it to be true and acted upon it. That has to be possibility or no one would ever change from not believing to believing. Everyone, without exception, starts out not believing.

---

For me the fact that he is not all-knowing and omnipotent only serves to further unmask the story.

You know that your logic fails badly right. That's OK then. Carry on