The logical consequences of omnipotence

[Esquilax]

God is a logical God. We wouldn't have a concept of an illogical God, so your first theory collapses badly.

What you miss in your second paragraph, not that the question is directed at you, is God's perspective. You assume God from a human perspective, so your second set of objections fail.

Your third objection fails for the same reason.

You don't seem to know much about the idea of God.

Interestingly, all of your arguments here only work if we take your reasoning at face value, yet you haven't proven a single one of your assertions. You've fallen back on circular reasoning for every single word of this post. Weird.