RE: The logical consequences of omnipotence
February 3, 2013 at 6:47 am
(This post was last modified: February 3, 2013 at 6:51 am by Mystical.)
Because if I read the thread, I'd know the arguments.
Did I read the thread?
Yes.
Did you ask if I read the thread?
No.
Did you tell me that if I read the thread my question would
be answered?
Yes you did.
Does that degrade the value of my question for the mere fact that I asked it?
Yes.
At the very least you were being assumptive, like usual.
Did I read the thread?
Yes.
Did you ask if I read the thread?
No.
Did you tell me that if I read the thread my question would
be answered?
Yes you did.
Does that degrade the value of my question for the mere fact that I asked it?
Yes.
At the very least you were being assumptive, like usual.
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
Quote:Some people deserve hell.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
![[Image: tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif]](https://66.media.tumblr.com/5fb74c6d16622fb3dbb358509c9aec03/tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif)