The logical consequences of omnipotence

[Esquilax]

That's an admirable outlook you have there, PhillipD. Unfortunately... it's the internet. You're battling upstream from the beginning.

For my part, I thought I defined the terms I wished to use pretty well in my original post, if not again in my latest. Omnipotence- really the only term I figured was important- has a very broad definition because it's a very broad term, but also because all of the Christians I've discussed it with don't want to put upper or lower limits on it, possibly for fear of being penned in by them.

I guess if I had to single sentence this bitch, it'd go like this: if god can do anything, then isn't the idea that god can't do something for fear of interfering with free will sort of a contradiction just on the face of it?