RE: Irreducible Complexity.
November 12, 2008 at 8:57 pm
(This post was last modified: November 12, 2008 at 8:59 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
(November 12, 2008 at 6:01 pm)CoxRox Wrote: Hi Leo, I understand a lot better now that IC has not undergone these rigorous scientific tests and understand why there is so much controversy surrounding it. (I hadn't realised that Miller is a Roman Catholic). I will not pursue this any further. I got a reply tonight from Behe, but he did not respond to my 3 brief points I had asked him to clarify for me, and enclosed a link to a web site. So he wasn't much help. He said he is very busy, but I thought he could at least try to answer the points I raised. I wasn't asking for a 2000 word dissertation.If he could post a link you would think he could have replied to 3 brief points. Maybe he didn't know the answer. Maybe he has to think about it
regards Catherine
. He could have given an answer right a way of course. But I think his answer would have looked foolish. I dunno. Well to me of course any answer about IC that supports ID would very probably sound foolish!But like I said if he could post a link you think he could have replied to 3 brief points! Unless he's got a message reply bot that just replies with links to sites!
