new testament, matthew chapter 2

[catfish]

I also want to point out the blatant LIE of you claiming that I introduced that passage, just sayin...
stupid fucking socks...
.

---

Bolded by me above. ^^^

Cognitive dissonance? I believe so...
Thank you, come again...
.

---

There's no cognitive dissonance. You introduced a passage which doesn't speak one way or another on infallibility. Most verses don't. You seem to be taking "doesn't support" as "opposes," but that conclusion isn't warranted.

Dude, you agreed that those didn't support infallibility, then you claim it did.
You presented 2 separate statements that conflicted with your beliefs, which of course, makes you a liar...
We're done here...
.

---

So John V... Is it a sin to drink gin?
.