The logical consequences of omnipotence

[fr0d0]

Omnipotrence as a concept is a fallacy. This can be exposed with a simple question.

Can an omnipotent being creatre a stone it cannot lift?

If it can then it is not omnipotent because it cannot lift the stone, if it cannot then it is not omnipotent because it cannot create the stone.

Go check it:

http://atheistforums.org/thread-1813.html

---

There is no knock out blow for theism or atheism here it's just a running battle where both sides see there propositions as far more reasonable than the other side.

Nonsense. The clear evidence supports the benefits of a positive world view. Read through this thread where we've covered that throughly.

---

It's not an embarrassment for all Christians, there are plenty of them who derive joy from pain and slaughter and call it good and righteous. There are Christians who rejoice at the image of God as an omnipresent Hitler, favoring those who praise him and meting out torture and mass murder to those who do not, as fr0d0's example above shows.

Utter tosh caused by wilfull blindness, I presume.