I loved "The silence of the lambs", not talking about the famous movie, but the novel by Thomas Harris and that is a confession because I usualy dont like to read thrillers. I saw the movie before, but the detail of charracter and the way the story was told was simply more epic in the novel.
I also read "Der Untergang" (The Downfall) before watching the film (which has the same name) and found the novel better than the film. Just like I read "Der Vorleser" (the Reader) before watching the film and finding the film shit yet the novel amazing. I guess in most cases the novel on which a film is based is better than the film.
I dont like Stephen King, dont know why, just couldnt get into it.
The only Stephen King novel I enjoyed was "Pet Sematary" of which I havent seen the movie. And I saw the movie "misery" which I think is epic.
I dont like to read fantasy, why I dont know. Or maybe I do.
I cant stand novels which take 2 pages to describe a hall of a palace.
I also read "Der Untergang" (The Downfall) before watching the film (which has the same name) and found the novel better than the film. Just like I read "Der Vorleser" (the Reader) before watching the film and finding the film shit yet the novel amazing. I guess in most cases the novel on which a film is based is better than the film.
I dont like Stephen King, dont know why, just couldnt get into it.
The only Stephen King novel I enjoyed was "Pet Sematary" of which I havent seen the movie. And I saw the movie "misery" which I think is epic.
I dont like to read fantasy, why I dont know. Or maybe I do.
I cant stand novels which take 2 pages to describe a hall of a palace.