(February 8, 2013 at 6:07 pm)Drich Wrote: Allow me to fix your squewed view:
D:"The book" say press this button for chocolate. (D press the button and gets chocolate)
CD: why didn't I get chocolate?
D: Did you press this button?
CD: No but I really Really want chocolate!
D: Then press this button
CD:But I have been pressing this button for 20 years. I deserve chocolate!
D:It's simple do this and get chocolate.
CD and Now SB: But everyone is pressing this button, and they are sincere.
Did they press the button "The book" told you to press?
SB: Special pleading.
D:Special pleading because you haven't done what you have been instructed to do, but still feel your entitled to chocolate?
SB No special pleading because you said we were not sincere enough!
D:What the Hell are you talking about? I have only ever asked did you do what the book said? Sincerity has absolutly nothing to do with "Getting Chocolate."
SB:Even though you said that like 100 times i will still insist that it is about sincerity, because this is the standard Atheist arguement against your position and I will argue it even though it has nothing to do with what your actually saying. Because you need to know I am opposed to the very principle, even if I do not know how to address the actual elements of your case.
D: So noted, so dismiss what i have said and lets move on, so those who are still trying to figure this out can do so on their own.
Reading comprehension fail. I did A/S/K, despite your claims to the contrary.
We're done here. Your distortion of what I said combined with endless goalpost moving tells me talking to you is a pointless waste of time.