(February 12, 2013 at 8:39 am)Brian37 Wrote: The honest historians HAVE NOT found one lick of evidence for the alleged Jesus character.Again, You just put a panic stop to the conversation.
If you put your faith in the commentaries of those in whom you wish to believe, then that is your right to do so. For I can find secular sources that do not doubt the existance of Jesus.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus
"Virtually all modern scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed,[1][2][3][4] and biblical scholars and classical historians regard theories of his non-existence as effectively refuted"
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bart-d-ehr...49544.html
"Mar 20, 2012 ... Whether we like it or not, Jesus certainly existed."
http://www.npr.org/2012/04/01/149462376/...s-his-case
This book examinine what evidence is avaiable. (not just alluding to it what is or is not there.)
But again, it's a matter of faith no matter what you believe. I am not here to tell you that your faith is wrong. (That's God's job) my job is to support those who wish to build a faith on Christ, and to dispell any myths or biblical inaccuracies/answer Questions and bring biblical Clarity (Which all depend on one's basic acceptance of the bible and Christ.) If you can not manage this then we have nothing to say to each other.
So again, If you wish to deny the existance of Christ it put a panic stop on the conversation.
