RE: A real study about Islamic sources & Hadiths :
February 14, 2013 at 8:33 am
(This post was last modified: February 14, 2013 at 8:48 am by Zone.)
(February 14, 2013 at 8:05 am)AtlasS Wrote: It's different, Zone. If you read the Quran in arabic you would understand. 300 years aren't 2 years. Notice that they did gather it in a very tight timeline, which gives a minimum chance of error.
If something was wrong in this book I would've known. It's flawless when it comes to language & context. The context would've got screwed if it was fake, just like the hadiths.
It's hard to find 600 pages which doesn't contradict themselves not even in a single word.
I read it many times & tried to fetch context errors. There are None.
I'm not sure how a deliberately manufactured collection of Jewish and Christian myths can contain errors, the Book of Mormon will be free of errors as well. But while the Quran may not contain errors as you would call them it would seem to me at least to contain contradictions. But the Quran is comparable in composition and time span to the writting of gospels of the Bible. There's good Hitchens video on this subject.



