(February 14, 2013 at 3:24 pm)Brian37 Wrote:(February 14, 2013 at 2:21 pm)Drich Wrote: Two things: I used the word bigot to describe one member because his actions literally matched the oxford english dictionary's defination word for blessed word. Yes I did so because I could, but also to show the level of hyprocrisy he was willing to stoop to, inorder to convict 'christianity.' Essentually he had to become or drop his intergerity below those in whom he thought he was persecuting. but none of that mattered to him. Meaning he is not a man of principle nor honor, if he was willing to sacerfice the very same principle and honor he was fighting for to figurtivly come out with the same net result as those he condemned. that's what a bigot is Brian, and that is why I happily identified him as such.
the second thing? I wanted to add a 'created god' to your list. Science is the god of those who do not believe in god. It is the alpha, it is the omega, it is the beginning and end to everything you think say and do. nothing you believe in is not first approved by this 'god' science.
So no matter what you believe their is still a measure of faith being used.
Quote: Science is the god of those who do not believe in god
No, science is not a religion, science does not require faith. Science demands kicking the tires. Science demands testing and review. Science demands giving up on old data and adapting to new information when the data is confirmed. It is also universal, unlike religion. SCIENCE is why you are typing on your computer. You don't pray to your computer do you?
"faith" does not require testing. "faith" does not require anything but wishful thinking and false hope.
I don't believe in your god for the same reason you don't believe in Thor or Allah. You don't have faith in the god claims of others, I simply lack faith in one more god than you do.
(February 14, 2013 at 2:28 pm)Chuck Wrote: Drich, nothing he could say damns christianity as completely as the fact that christianity produces imbeciles like you.
This is why I want Drich here, he does my work for me.
Oh, so your saying 'science' is 100% reliable 100% of the time? That absolutly no 'faith' is expended in believeing the current version of reality 'science' has offered you?
