(February 28, 2013 at 7:41 pm)oanghelidi Wrote:(February 28, 2013 at 7:31 pm)Baalzebutt Wrote: For the sake of everyone reading this thread, could you please define "consciousness"?
And please, define it in quantifiable, verifiable, falsifiable terms.
Neuroscientists are saying that consciousness equals information processing in the brain. But if you have information processing and consciousness is not there then what? My point is I have got the information processing and the consciousness is not there.
I do not know how consciousness is defined. What I am saying is that the equality does not hold so another explanation must be employed...
If you can't define something, you can't test it. You just shat on your own tie, my friend. You are a crackpot and a intellectually dishonest charlatan.
The simple fact of the matter is that our current technology is unable to create a computer simulation of the human brain. This fact alone shoots down your entire premise before it ever gets off the ground.
You are taking information from somewhere and bending it to fit whatever wacko idea you happen to be ruminating on. This is not science. This is hardly even a good parody of science.
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." -Einstein