Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit

[genkaus]

Here is the Discovery Channel article on their web site:
http://news.discovery.com/tech/cat-brain...-hype.html

It seems they removed it. I wonder why they would do that if your claim was factual?

Now if anyone would like to check the source I strongly invite them to do so. Writing to Markram won't gurantee you a response, but writing to the author / guy that interviewed Markram can get you a response. A researcher from England did that a couple of weeks ago.

Don't need to. Google tells me a lot more.

Spaun is developed by Eliasmith. I have got nothing to do with that. It is a considerable smaller simulation in terms of size, details and theoretical models employed.

And yet, it has the distinction of being the largest simulation while yours is nowhere to be found. I wonder why is that?

It doesn't add. There are two different simulations.

Ofcourse, there are two different simulations. One has references throughout the internet and in multiple journals and the other's only claim to existence is your insistence that it exists.

Oh wait! Is it just me or does that sound suspiciously like your god?

I am not doing this for fame. You got me wrong.

I should hope not. It would be just pathetic of you were this bad at both getting famous and getting to the truth.

I did change the color of the article. See the link to the Discovery Channel web site above.

So that means that second website is yours? That explains it. That's why I can't find any support to your claim anywhere other your own website.

Google is interesting, but their large statistical models are quite simple.

Yes, that is correct. I did submit to some journals but was refused. Obviously science needs to be done by researchers in Universities. Maybe someone may want to check what Grigori Perelman had to say about that.

Yeah... or maybe it was because your journals were crap. No way of judging that unless you present them here.

Like I said in the previous post. I do not care about credibility.

Clearly, since you have none.

[quote='oanghelidi' pid='407749' dateline='1362101964']I am strying to determine the social impact of my findings. I have posted on other web sites, and I can see that the religious folk has no problem with that. On the other hand the atheists got riled up.

I know. I've noticed it too. All the atheists here get so ANGRY when someone comes around making bullshit claims without backing them up. Its almost as if we cared about what's true and what's not.

[quote='oanghelidi' pid='407749' dateline='1362101964']I am a compassionate soul and I am trying to determine the best course of action.

I think the best course of action for you has been indicated pretty clearly.

I haven't prove God. But the results strongly point in that direction.

What results? I haven't seen any.

And once again, disproving one thing does not make another thing true. All it means is that the one thing you disproved is not true.

In math it does.

No, it doesn't. If I disprove 2+2=5, that doesn't make 2+2=3 true.