Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 27, 2024, 2:57 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit
#46
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit
(February 28, 2013 at 11:16 pm)oanghelidi Wrote: It is basic scientific practice to use inversion. If something is not true prove that is false, if something is true prove that is not false.

Even more basic is to start with a working definition of what you are trying to prove. You seem to have slept through that class.

(February 28, 2013 at 11:16 pm)oanghelidi Wrote: I know precisely what I am studying. In the case of consciousness the situation is not that simple.

Take your time.

(February 28, 2013 at 11:16 pm)oanghelidi Wrote: If my mind was full of errors do you really think that I could have done what I did?

You mean build the world's largest brain simulation with 700 billion neurons? The one which is referred to only in an obscure website which you can apparently alter while the real title of the same lies with another simulation that is much smaller than yours? Yeah, I don't really believe that you did what say you did.

(February 28, 2013 at 11:16 pm)oanghelidi Wrote: And also have you wondered what compelled Markram to add me in that article?

You mean the mention that takes place in one paragraph in one interview that appears only on the website you can alter? The very same interview which is posted elsewhere nearly verbatim, only without any reference to you? The interview which you keep saying is posted on the discovery website, which they've apparently removed, leading to questions like, "why would they remove it if everything was on up and up"? Yeah - I don't believe Markham added you to the article.


(February 28, 2013 at 11:16 pm)oanghelidi Wrote: Plus Markram is saying: "Try doing it on a GRID or on desktops".

Did he? Did he now? That is another line that's in blue text and also doesn't appear in other versions.


(February 28, 2013 at 11:16 pm)oanghelidi Wrote: Now if Markram would be the only guy that I spoke with since my main findings that wouldn't be much. I also spoke with Erik de Schutter, the former president of Organization of Computational Neuroscience. I told him that I was interested to build a neuromorphic architecture (specialized ASIC chips for neural simulations) and that he could have used it to test some of their models on this platform, but his concern was that I might work on some other research, and I would not be able to support the platform for them. I guess working in various fields and on all kinds of problems, makes me unstable for some repetitive tasks. Perhaps someone should check with Erik that he said that too.

I checked with Eric. He says that he was just being polite, while in reality he wouldn't trust you to bring him his coffee.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by oanghelidi - February 28, 2013 at 6:06 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by Baalzebutt - February 28, 2013 at 6:10 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by oanghelidi - February 28, 2013 at 6:22 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by Baalzebutt - February 28, 2013 at 7:19 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by oanghelidi - February 28, 2013 at 7:33 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by Baalzebutt - February 28, 2013 at 7:40 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by genkaus - February 28, 2013 at 6:35 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by oanghelidi - February 28, 2013 at 6:37 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by oanghelidi - February 28, 2013 at 7:08 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by pocaracas - February 28, 2013 at 7:27 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by oanghelidi - February 28, 2013 at 8:01 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by pocaracas - February 28, 2013 at 7:00 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by Baalzebutt - February 28, 2013 at 7:31 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by oanghelidi - February 28, 2013 at 7:41 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by Jackalope - February 28, 2013 at 7:44 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by oanghelidi - February 28, 2013 at 7:51 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by Baalzebutt - February 28, 2013 at 7:50 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by Jackalope - February 28, 2013 at 7:38 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by oanghelidi - February 28, 2013 at 7:47 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by Jackalope - February 28, 2013 at 8:10 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by oanghelidi - February 28, 2013 at 8:13 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by oanghelidi - February 28, 2013 at 8:15 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by Baalzebutt - February 28, 2013 at 8:45 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by oanghelidi - February 28, 2013 at 9:02 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by Baalzebutt - February 28, 2013 at 9:23 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by genkaus - February 28, 2013 at 9:18 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by oanghelidi - February 28, 2013 at 9:39 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by oanghelidi - February 28, 2013 at 9:51 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by genkaus - February 28, 2013 at 10:14 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by Jackalope - February 28, 2013 at 9:49 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by oanghelidi - February 28, 2013 at 10:04 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by Baalzebutt - February 28, 2013 at 10:16 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by Jackalope - February 28, 2013 at 10:16 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by Baalzebutt - February 28, 2013 at 9:55 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by oanghelidi - February 28, 2013 at 10:15 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by oanghelidi - February 28, 2013 at 10:39 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by Baalzebutt - February 28, 2013 at 11:02 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by oanghelidi - February 28, 2013 at 11:16 pm
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by genkaus - March 1, 2013 at 11:02 am
RE: Mathematical Neuroscience and The Spirit - by genkaus - March 2, 2013 at 11:42 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Gender of Holy Spirit TwoKnives99 31 5953 November 17, 2018 at 2:10 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  The Human Spirit AFTT47 14 4301 August 21, 2015 at 10:24 pm
Last Post: T.J.
  Blaspheming the holy spirit Ravenshire 9 2572 July 28, 2014 at 3:11 am
Last Post: Fidel_Castronaut
  In the spirit of "Ask a ______" Rampant.A.I. 6 1752 July 11, 2014 at 9:57 am
Last Post: ignoramus
  Cousins in the Spirit: Angels of Iran zanOTK 0 1374 June 26, 2014 at 6:08 am
Last Post: zanOTK
  Witness of the Holy Spirit ThePinsir 10 2974 February 4, 2014 at 2:10 pm
Last Post: rexbeccarox
  Mathematical Proof that Absence of Evidence *IS* Evidence of Absence Gooders1002 4 3110 May 13, 2013 at 1:34 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Destroying "atheism", God(The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit) is a Fact SavedByChrist94 50 27658 January 3, 2013 at 10:16 am
Last Post: paulpablo
  Spirit and then there is brain damage Ace Otana 22 11909 April 29, 2010 at 5:20 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  The Spirit (Hebrew Ruach / Greek Pneuma) Daystar 29 20240 November 9, 2008 at 10:36 am
Last Post: Kyuuketsuki



Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)