Non-religious evidence for existence of God

[Esquilax]

but how did that happen, since mutations are allways harmful. and even if it was trough mutations, it is very difficult to swallow that non-thinking nature create parts for the future engine and put the on correct places.

Mutations are always harmful? Huh. You understand that you're so very, very wrong when you say that, right? If not, here's a list of beneficial mutations observed in nature: http://www.gate.net/~rwms/EvoMutations.html

And here's the same list, but for humans: http://bigthink.com/daylight-atheism/evo...-in-humans

So... you know, wrong.

no they are are not help anytime,

Hoo boy, that's a long passage you undoubtedly copy/pasted from elsewhere, in aid of a claim that is demonstrably wrong...

like what, give me an example

Well, keeping with the sperm example, how about infertile people? In some cases it's not about low production of sperm, but low motility; the sperm exist, they just don't have the correct tail structure to move about. Now, if your god has designed this, why would he bother then ensuring that it's implemented incorrectly?

but how can you believe this man?

if nature cant think, how can stuff just emerge out of nowhere and let say

It didn't emerge out of nowhere. I believe I've told you this before. It's a culmination of generations of small changes. There's no design, the pieces aren't moving toward some goal, they each serve their own individual function and then, over time, alter to the point that they serve a new function in the body. Think of it like this: you can use your car to transport yourself, but you can also use it to hit and kill people. That doesn't mean the car was made with both purposes in mind.

Now i need a stator for my future motor, and then i need to develop rotor, and after i finished with that i need alo clutch

Can I ask why you continue saying this when it's been explained to you several posts back? Are you incapable of understanding, or just lying in the hopes that it makes your argument more credible?

i really dont know how you people can beleive in this and you call yourself logical people, that is nonsence in myu opinion.

Well, we can't be held responsible for your inability or unwillingness to learn, now can we?

engine is like a puzzle, parts on correct places, to put puzzles you need to think, and yo uadmitted that nature does not think. why is it so difficult for you to accept that God is the creator?

Because there's no evidence for your god, but plenty of evidence for evolution. And you can keep making this comparison to puzzles and engines all you want, but that doesn't follow that the comparison is apt; it's not. You're basing your arguments on fundamentally flawed logic not based on evidence because it feels correct to you.