My english is better than that of conservative Americans

[Rev. Rye]

re: existence of homosexuality in biology: Do you think if people are genetically predisposed to cancer, that makes cancer biologically correct? Is consider considered biologically good, if people don't have control over whether they get cancer or not?

I take it that you're considering "biologically correct" as equivalent to "healthy."

Apart from your phrasing being stupid, the problem is that it doesn't seem likely that homosexual sex is really any less healthy than heterosexual sex.

And quite frankly, just because something's healthy doesn't necessarily make it a moral good. It's not exactly a moral evil and I frankly consider it outside of questions of morality, especially when you don't bring other people into it.