Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 3, 2025, 6:56 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
So much for "intelligent design"
#1
So much for "intelligent design"
Men's sex chromosome is doomed: scientist

http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/breaking...6611171605



Quote:THE poorly designed Y chromosome that makes men is degrading rapidly and will disappear, even if humans are still around.

Evolutionary geneticist Jenny Graves says while the process is likely to happen within the next five million years it could have begun in some isolated groups.

"As long as something came along it its stead, we would not even suspect without checking the chromosomes," she told AAP on Tuesday.

Professor Groves, who first made the prediction some years ago, was in Canberra to give a public lecture on the subject for the Australian Academy of Science.

There have been dissenting research papers, but her prediction hasn't changed.

"Its very bad news for all the men here," she told her audience.

Prof Graves has been studying sex-determining genes in Australian animals to shed light on human genetics.

"You would think that sex is so important it wouldn't change a lot. But it changes all over the place and the Y chromosome sort of self-destructs," she told AAP.

http://www.latrobe.edu.au/scitecheng/abo...me=JGraves
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
Reply



Messages In This Thread
So much for "intelligent design" - by KichigaiNeko - April 2, 2013 at 6:48 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Joel - April 2, 2013 at 7:01 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by KichigaiNeko - April 2, 2013 at 7:03 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Joel - April 2, 2013 at 7:04 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by KichigaiNeko - April 2, 2013 at 7:06 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Joel - April 2, 2013 at 7:07 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Brian37 - April 2, 2013 at 7:08 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by KichigaiNeko - April 2, 2013 at 7:09 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by MysticKnight - April 2, 2013 at 8:07 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by pocaracas - April 2, 2013 at 9:03 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Joel - April 2, 2013 at 9:06 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by MysticKnight - April 2, 2013 at 9:23 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Joel - April 2, 2013 at 9:24 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by MysticKnight - April 2, 2013 at 9:25 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Jackalope - April 21, 2013 at 7:41 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by bladevalant546 - April 21, 2013 at 8:02 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Anomalocaris - April 21, 2013 at 2:52 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Minimalist - April 21, 2013 at 3:10 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Anomalocaris - April 21, 2013 at 3:22 pm
Re: So much for "intelligent design" - by frz - April 21, 2013 at 5:34 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Minimalist - April 21, 2013 at 5:38 pm
Re: RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by frz - April 21, 2013 at 7:44 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Minimalist - April 21, 2013 at 7:55 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Tonus - April 21, 2013 at 9:19 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Aractus - April 21, 2013 at 9:47 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Minimalist - April 21, 2013 at 10:59 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Aractus - April 22, 2013 at 1:47 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Fruity - April 22, 2013 at 12:21 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by bladevalant546 - April 22, 2013 at 12:35 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Fruity - April 22, 2013 at 12:41 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Minimalist - April 22, 2013 at 2:53 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Aractus - April 22, 2013 at 3:12 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Justtristo - April 22, 2013 at 3:50 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Aractus - April 23, 2013 at 4:16 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Minimalist - April 22, 2013 at 3:36 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Intelligent Design Is Pseudoscience: Creationist Lies About Evolution Debunked CodeDNA 7 1745 April 22, 2023 at 6:44 pm
Last Post: no one
  Blind evolution or intelligent design? ignoramus 12 2872 August 2, 2017 at 8:00 pm
Last Post: Succubus
  How much did we pay for this? brewer 3 1015 December 14, 2016 at 10:28 am
Last Post: Jackalope
  Carthaginian DNA - Not So Much Of A Surprise. Minimalist 0 1561 May 26, 2016 at 12:48 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  Why Do Otherwise Intelligent People Succomb to Religion? Rhondazvous 47 11221 October 25, 2015 at 8:40 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Directionality in evolution without intelligent guidance tantric 25 6756 January 22, 2015 at 6:19 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Primordial earth much more hospitable to life than imagined. Anomalocaris 0 1243 September 17, 2014 at 10:31 am
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Intelligent Design: Irreducible Complexity? OfficerVajardian 49 16256 August 17, 2014 at 2:37 pm
Last Post: Esquilax
  Intelligent Design triumph! Mudhammam 2 1534 July 17, 2014 at 7:05 am
Last Post: FreeTony
  Intelligent Design, Proof VI - Instincts Muslim Scholar 57 27475 October 30, 2013 at 9:45 am
Last Post: orogenicman



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)