Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 5, 2025, 7:13 am
Atheist Forums › Science › Life Sciences v
So much for "intelligent design"

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
So much for "intelligent design"
Joel Offline
Member
***
Religious Views: Secular Humanist
Posts: 548
Threads: 13
Joined: March 12, 2013
Reputation: 7
#11
RE: So much for "intelligent design"
April 2, 2013 at 9:06 am
(April 2, 2013 at 8:07 am)MysticKnight Wrote: There is hadiths near the end of times, that women would severely out number men (I think like 50:1).

I guess Prophet Mohammad knew this from before. Tongue Again -> Aliens ->Illuminati (Servants of Aliens) -> Religion means of control -> Matrix it's all a means of control (including the Oracle) Tongue
Or rather (I just checked the hadith) - that "it's a sign of the hour (day of judgement) that women will outnumber men 50:1" mentioned in Sahih Bukhari and some other books.

So now we have both Islamic, Judaic and Christian prophecies coming true! (along with faiths outside of the Abrahamic)
I wonder which is the correct religion...
(March 30, 2013 at 9:51 pm)ThatMuslimGuy2 Wrote: Never read anything immoral in the Qur'an.
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Science › Life Sciences v
So much for "intelligent design"

Messages In This Thread
So much for "intelligent design" - by KichigaiNeko - April 2, 2013 at 6:48 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Joel - April 2, 2013 at 7:01 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by KichigaiNeko - April 2, 2013 at 7:03 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Joel - April 2, 2013 at 7:04 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by KichigaiNeko - April 2, 2013 at 7:06 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Joel - April 2, 2013 at 7:07 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Brian37 - April 2, 2013 at 7:08 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by KichigaiNeko - April 2, 2013 at 7:09 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by MysticKnight - April 2, 2013 at 8:07 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by pocaracas - April 2, 2013 at 9:03 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Joel - April 2, 2013 at 9:06 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by MysticKnight - April 2, 2013 at 9:23 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Joel - April 2, 2013 at 9:24 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by MysticKnight - April 2, 2013 at 9:25 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Jackalope - April 21, 2013 at 7:41 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by bladevalant546 - April 21, 2013 at 8:02 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Anomalocaris - April 21, 2013 at 2:52 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Minimalist - April 21, 2013 at 3:10 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Anomalocaris - April 21, 2013 at 3:22 pm
Re: So much for "intelligent design" - by frz - April 21, 2013 at 5:34 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Minimalist - April 21, 2013 at 5:38 pm
Re: RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by frz - April 21, 2013 at 7:44 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Minimalist - April 21, 2013 at 7:55 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Tonus - April 21, 2013 at 9:19 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Aractus - April 21, 2013 at 9:47 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Minimalist - April 21, 2013 at 10:59 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Aractus - April 22, 2013 at 1:47 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Fruity - April 22, 2013 at 12:21 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by bladevalant546 - April 22, 2013 at 12:35 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Fruity - April 22, 2013 at 12:41 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Minimalist - April 22, 2013 at 2:53 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Aractus - April 22, 2013 at 3:12 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Justtristo - April 22, 2013 at 3:50 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Aractus - April 23, 2013 at 4:16 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Minimalist - April 22, 2013 at 3:36 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Intelligent Design Is Pseudoscience: Creationist Lies About Evolution Debunked CodeDNA 7 1335 April 22, 2023 at 6:44 pm
Last Post: no one
  Blind evolution or intelligent design? ignoramus 12 2476 August 2, 2017 at 8:00 pm
Last Post: Succubus
  How much did we pay for this? brewer 3 902 December 14, 2016 at 10:28 am
Last Post: Jackalope
  Carthaginian DNA - Not So Much Of A Surprise. Minimalist 0 1444 May 26, 2016 at 12:48 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  Why Do Otherwise Intelligent People Succomb to Religion? Rhondazvous 47 10109 October 25, 2015 at 8:40 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Directionality in evolution without intelligent guidance tantric 25 6046 January 22, 2015 at 6:19 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Primordial earth much more hospitable to life than imagined. Anomalocaris 0 1050 September 17, 2014 at 10:31 am
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Intelligent Design: Irreducible Complexity? OfficerVajardian 49 14362 August 17, 2014 at 2:37 pm
Last Post: Esquilax
  Intelligent Design triumph! Mudhammam 2 1408 July 17, 2014 at 7:05 am
Last Post: FreeTony
  Intelligent Design, Proof VI - Instincts Muslim Scholar 57 25288 October 30, 2013 at 9:45 am
Last Post: orogenicman



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)