RE: For the logic impaired...
April 2, 2013 at 1:45 pm
(This post was last modified: April 2, 2013 at 1:55 pm by fr0d0.)
(April 2, 2013 at 3:44 am)The Germans are coming Wrote:(April 2, 2013 at 2:44 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Yes, extermination is the answer. I can see that clearly now. Thanks for the clarification.
Well what is the answere!? To completly criminalise abortion and to thereby force single mums and other women who are incapable of affording a child into misery and thereby also their child?
It seems hypocritical to me to insist on the rights of an unborn 3 month old fetus and to completly accept that this child might have to spend the rest of it`s life in poverty.
But out of interest, let me ask:
Do you support state funded mesures which care for children and make parenting easier?
Do you support contraception?
Do you support sex education?
Firstly, this is not an emotive subject for me. You may see my early postings on this forum stating the opposite view. What I relate is something that became apparent to me. I have no investment in one side of the argument or the other.
1. The answer is that it's a question of ethics. From conception we have life that is a person. To treat it as any less is misleading yourself.
Now there are justified reasons to terminate this life, but let's not sugar coat it and pretend it's something other than a person at any stage of development.
2. You value riches over life. I don't. How can you choose someone's death based upon such an unknowable? Ah look it looks like Germans is going to experience hardship.. let's kill him now.
3. I support state assistance services, yes. I have no objection to contraception. I support sex education.
(April 2, 2013 at 10:26 am)Moros Synackaon Wrote: Contraception and abortion grant the ability to sidestep that dilemma
With contraception no unique individual has its life terminated. With abortion you have to make that call.
No dilemma/ dilemma
