(April 2, 2013 at 11:41 pm)catfish Wrote: The writers were relaying oral stories that noone knows from where or how old they were.
So MysticKnight, are you another literalist fundie? Do you expect me to give you the "key" or do you read it and decide for yourself?
Well I don't care what you label me. To me it's a fallacy of ambiguity to say it means something most people would not understand from first impression. If it has two indistinguishable first impressions, then that is also a fallacy of ambiguity.
Language is not meant to confuse people, but convey thoughts.
For example, when Jesus talked about the temple being risen in 3 days, that was a fallacy of ambiguity, because none of his intended audience would've understood the way it was intended (ie. that he is the temple or his body is the temple).