(April 3, 2013 at 1:22 pm)Joel Wrote: If a woman is raped and does not want the child - she shouldn't be forced to keep it... Rather than she had consensual sex and got pregnant - knowing that she may get pregnant.
Not a lot of things you know when you're properly shmashed. You don't remember any of it!
If she had consensual sex and does not want the child: why should she be forced to keep it? What's so special about rape anyway?
It's a means to the end, and the end is pregnancy, and the pregnancy which is the issue. Quote:If her potential child is tested and found that it may be born with severe defects/disease, then she should have the choice.
I agree. Defects such as screaming should not be forced upon any mother. If only chuck norris and jesus characters are allowed to be born: we shall become THE MASTER RACE!
Why do defects and disease exempt her from having no choice? How are these negatively perceived problems with a potential person somehow worth more than other negative perceived problems with them? If one exception: another. And another. And why not some more?
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
