(April 14, 2013 at 10:40 am)Rhythm Wrote:(April 2, 2013 at 11:10 pm)catfish Wrote: You ignore the fact that most religious and secular scholoars agree to the basic history of the OT. You should look into that.
Wow, can't believe I missed this one, way back. You are miles off the rez now Cat. By "basic" I assume that you mean "sans dragons" - but unfortunately even this is a step too far. No, there is no "basic history" in the OT.
Holy fucking shit dude.
You fucking manage to twist my words around by confusing "of" with "in".
So which is it? Intentional or mistake?
.