Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: September 30, 2024, 2:37 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual
#18
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual
(April 16, 2013 at 7:03 pm)archangle Wrote: so the Jews didn't have a general/leader that lead them to a land and they conquered that land? really?

what is your proof?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/704190/posts

Quote:• The conquest: One of the formative events of the people of Israel in biblical historiography is the story of how the land was conquered from the Canaanites. Yet extremely serious difficulties have cropped up precisely in the attempts to locate the archaeological evidence for this story. Repeated excavations by various expeditions at Jericho and Ai, the two cities whose conquest is described in the greatest detail in the Book of Joshua, have proved very disappointing. Despite the excavators' efforts, it emerged that in the late part of the 13th century BCE, at the end of the Late Bronze Age, which is the agreed period for the conquest, there were no cities in either tell, and of course no walls that could have been toppled. Naturally, explanations were offered for these anomalies. Some claimed that the walls around Jericho were washed away by rain, while others suggested that earlier walls had been used; and, as for Ai, it was claimed that the original story actually referred to the conquest of nearby Beit El and was transferred to Ai by later redactors.

Biblical scholars suggested a quarter of a century ago that the conquest stories be viewed as etiological legends and no more. But as more and more sites were uncovered and it emerged that the places in question died out or were simply abandoned at different times, the conclusion that there is no factual basis for the biblical story about the conquest by Israelite tribes in a military campaign led by Joshua was bolstered.

This piece was published in Haaretz - in Israel, in 1999, and touched off a firestorm which continues to this day. It was not news to archaeologists who had known all of this since this 70's but it pissed off the fundies and the orthodox jews something fierce. Fuck all of them!

The author, Ze'ev Herzog....

Quote:Ze’ev Herzog (Hebrew: זאב הרצוג‎, born 1941) is an Israeli archeologist, professor of archaeology at The Department of Archaeology and Ancient Near Eastern Cultures at Tel Aviv University specializing in social archaeology, ancient architecture and field archaeology.

is an accomplished archaeologist.

You, are not.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by JesusHChrist - April 16, 2013 at 4:01 pm
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by Minimalist - April 16, 2013 at 4:11 pm
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by CleanShavenJesus - April 16, 2013 at 4:15 pm
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by Minimalist - April 16, 2013 at 4:34 pm
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by JesusHChrist - April 16, 2013 at 4:41 pm
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by Neo-Scholastic - April 16, 2013 at 4:45 pm
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by Chaostheosis - April 16, 2013 at 6:12 pm
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by Minimalist - April 16, 2013 at 5:22 pm
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by JesusHChrist - April 16, 2013 at 5:45 pm
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by Minimalist - April 16, 2013 at 5:46 pm
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by JesusHChrist - April 16, 2013 at 5:50 pm
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by Minimalist - April 16, 2013 at 5:56 pm
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by JesusHChrist - April 16, 2013 at 6:21 pm
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by archangle - April 16, 2013 at 7:03 pm
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by JesusHChrist - April 16, 2013 at 7:11 pm
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by Statler Waldorf - April 16, 2013 at 8:30 pm
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by JesusHChrist - April 16, 2013 at 11:58 pm
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by downbeatplumb - April 17, 2013 at 12:26 pm
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by archangle - April 17, 2013 at 8:56 am
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by JesusHChrist - April 17, 2013 at 10:09 am
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by Minimalist - April 17, 2013 at 11:06 am
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by archangle - April 18, 2013 at 7:47 am
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by Lord Privy Seal - April 17, 2013 at 11:57 am
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by Minimalist - April 16, 2013 at 8:47 pm
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by Tonus - April 16, 2013 at 7:06 pm
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by Minimalist - April 17, 2013 at 12:17 pm
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by Minimalist - April 17, 2013 at 9:17 pm
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by Minimalist - April 18, 2013 at 11:54 am
RE: The Bible Is Mostly Not Factual - by JesusHChrist - April 18, 2013 at 5:10 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Flat Earther, and other conspiracy theories. Are they mostly atheists? Ferrocyanide 95 9296 April 26, 2021 at 3:56 am
Last Post: Tomatoshadow2
  Satanic Bible vs Christian Bible ƵenKlassen 31 8349 November 27, 2017 at 10:38 am
Last Post: drfuzzy
  Why the Texas shooting is not evil, based on the bible Face2face 56 17103 November 16, 2017 at 7:21 am
Last Post: Little Rik
  Christians - even the Bible says that Jesus was not God so why do you say he was ? jenny1972 299 52142 November 3, 2015 at 8:07 pm
Last Post: jenny1972



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)