(April 21, 2013 at 12:51 pm)whateverist Wrote: Whereas pieces of papers are not the sort of thing we think of as assigning or conveying meaning, brains are precisely the kind of thing we think does so.To me that is part of what makes the problem so interesting. Why do you (and I) make an exception for one particular physical system? What makes the brain different from the paper is the presence of operations you associate with mind. We do not suppose that ink and paper, thermostats, and computers have minds?
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 1, 2025, 7:03 pm
Thread Rating:
Rosenberg's Argument Against Beliefs
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)