(November 29, 2009 at 11:56 am)Purple Rabbit Wrote:(November 29, 2009 at 11:31 am)theVOID Wrote: Perfect for who? As long as there is the notion that somethings flaws and defects can add an element to it or enhance it's appeal to someone then there can be no such thing.What you are decribing is not absolute perfection. So again, is absolute perfection subjective?
You misunderstood me.
Absolute perfection is not subjective by definition, the problem is that i doubt very much that such a thing could exist in any real sense outside of purely conceptual thought, so i for now reject the notion of Absolute perfection in favor of subjective interpretations.
It gets a little fuzzy in where to draw the line though, something can be perfect in a specific function, but when you are talking about something so absolutely perfect that there is no need for anything else at all then you need to account for all possible functions this perfection would have to have to be perfect, but you couldn't do it because of the contradictory claims that you would encounter.
.