(November 29, 2009 at 12:26 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: You mistakenly align me with some strange literalist interpretations. As I hope you will appreciate there is no reason for me to address those. Or were you being deliberately childish perhaps?As for now I am not assigning any specific christian interpretation to you. I am clearly asking how YOU bridge the gap between science and biblical account. I know there are many incompatible versions of the truth within christianity, all only requiring faith. But the fact there are many interpretations shows that it is impossible to resolve truth on faith alone.
It is with your own twisted interpretation you seek to hang me. Perhaps you should look a little closer to home? Me I shall stick with my best effort unless something better should present itself amid this dross.
I observe you are adding more and more emotion to your replies (with words like 'childish', 'dull' 'dross'). It seems it is your trademark. I hereby inform you that I do not seek to 'hang you' but am looking for argumentative debate. I am attacking opinions not you as a person. It is your good right to not answer my question how you bridge the gap but it won't credit you in debate.
"I'm like a rabbit suddenly trapped, in the blinding headlights of vacuous crap" - Tim Minchin in "Storm"
Christianity is perfect bullshit, christians are not - Purple Rabbit, honouring CS Lewis
Faith is illogical - fr0d0
Christianity is perfect bullshit, christians are not - Purple Rabbit, honouring CS Lewis
Faith is illogical - fr0d0