RE: One of the two terrorists involved in the Boston bombing has been killed
April 22, 2013 at 10:29 am
(April 22, 2013 at 10:10 am)A Theist Wrote:(April 22, 2013 at 9:37 am)DeistPaladin Wrote: Specific examples anytime. Otherwise, it's "No U!"...that almost immediately after the bombings in Boston, leftwingers like Chris Matthews and Wolfe Blitzer began "speculating", (accusing) the right? You did it yourself...you leftists will waste no time to throw out baseless speculations, (accusations) against conservatives and tea partiers and be too spineless and cowardly to call out Islamic extremists for the terrorist bombings in Boston...as far as the hate speech from you leftwingers, you don't have to go off this forum to see it...and from a few members in particular...
***Facepalm***
Wow, that was even more feeble than I expected, and that's saying a lot.
Seriously, that's the best you can do? Couldn't you dig up some guy with a blog somewhere who said something advocating violence against conservatives and say "see, this compares to high profile conservative commentators who have their own TV shows or lead political action groups"?
The best you can do is, "Waaaahhhh, they're calling out our hate. That's hate speech to call out our hate."
No, it's not. Try again?
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
