Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 5, 2024, 11:29 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
So much for "intelligent design"
#36
RE: So much for "intelligent design"
(April 22, 2013 at 3:50 am)Justtristo Wrote: I want to ask a question here,

Why should Young Earth Creationist views be treated with any respect or dignity?. Look at the respect and dignity (lack therefore) that believers of Mormonism and Scientology are given for believing in stuff no more ridiculous than Six Day Creationism, or for matter believers in a Flat Earth being at the center of the Universe (which is a view which the writers of the Old Testament subscribed to).
Oh look the ones that actively decide to take on and criticise science absolutely deserve the ridicule they get. I criticise science all the time, but I don't go parading heretical theories while I'm at it, lol. Scientology is an extremist group - they will literally tell patients who are taking medications their doctors prescribe for them not to take their meds - nothing could be more extremist there...
For Religion & Health see:[/b][/size] Williams & Sternthal. (2007). Spirituality, religion and health: Evidence and research directions. Med. J. Aust., 186(10), S47-S50. -LINK

The WIN/Gallup End of Year Survey 2013 found the US was perceived to be the greatest threat to world peace by a huge margin, with 24% of respondents fearful of the US followed by: 8% for Pakistan, and 6% for China. This was followed by 5% each for: Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, North Korea. -LINK


"That's disgusting. There were clean athletes out there that have had their whole careers ruined by people like Lance Armstrong who just bended thoughts to fit their circumstances. He didn't look up cheating because he wanted to stop, he wanted to justify what he was doing and to keep that continuing on." - Nicole Cooke
Reply



Messages In This Thread
So much for "intelligent design" - by KichigaiNeko - April 2, 2013 at 6:48 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Joel - April 2, 2013 at 7:01 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by KichigaiNeko - April 2, 2013 at 7:03 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Joel - April 2, 2013 at 7:04 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by KichigaiNeko - April 2, 2013 at 7:06 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Joel - April 2, 2013 at 7:07 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Brian37 - April 2, 2013 at 7:08 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by KichigaiNeko - April 2, 2013 at 7:09 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by MysticKnight - April 2, 2013 at 8:07 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by pocaracas - April 2, 2013 at 9:03 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Joel - April 2, 2013 at 9:06 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by MysticKnight - April 2, 2013 at 9:23 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Joel - April 2, 2013 at 9:24 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by MysticKnight - April 2, 2013 at 9:25 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Jackalope - April 21, 2013 at 7:41 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by bladevalant546 - April 21, 2013 at 8:02 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Anomalocaris - April 21, 2013 at 2:52 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Minimalist - April 21, 2013 at 3:10 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Anomalocaris - April 21, 2013 at 3:22 pm
Re: So much for "intelligent design" - by frz - April 21, 2013 at 5:34 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Minimalist - April 21, 2013 at 5:38 pm
Re: RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by frz - April 21, 2013 at 7:44 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Minimalist - April 21, 2013 at 7:55 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Tonus - April 21, 2013 at 9:19 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Aractus - April 21, 2013 at 9:47 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Minimalist - April 21, 2013 at 10:59 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Aractus - April 22, 2013 at 1:47 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Fruity - April 22, 2013 at 12:21 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by bladevalant546 - April 22, 2013 at 12:35 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Fruity - April 22, 2013 at 12:41 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Minimalist - April 22, 2013 at 2:53 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Aractus - April 22, 2013 at 3:12 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Justtristo - April 22, 2013 at 3:50 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Aractus - April 23, 2013 at 4:16 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Minimalist - April 22, 2013 at 3:36 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Intelligent Design Is Pseudoscience: Creationist Lies About Evolution Debunked CodeDNA 7 1268 April 22, 2023 at 6:44 pm
Last Post: no one
  Blind evolution or intelligent design? ignoramus 12 2297 August 2, 2017 at 8:00 pm
Last Post: Succubus
  How much did we pay for this? brewer 3 883 December 14, 2016 at 10:28 am
Last Post: Jackalope
  Carthaginian DNA - Not So Much Of A Surprise. Minimalist 0 1417 May 26, 2016 at 12:48 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  Why Do Otherwise Intelligent People Succomb to Religion? Rhondazvous 47 9810 October 25, 2015 at 8:40 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Directionality in evolution without intelligent guidance tantric 25 5889 January 22, 2015 at 6:19 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Primordial earth much more hospitable to life than imagined. Anomalocaris 0 1044 September 17, 2014 at 10:31 am
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Intelligent Design: Irreducible Complexity? OfficerVajardian 49 13972 August 17, 2014 at 2:37 pm
Last Post: Esquilax
  Intelligent Design triumph! Mudhammam 2 1378 July 17, 2014 at 7:05 am
Last Post: FreeTony
  Intelligent Design, Proof VI - Instincts Muslim Scholar 57 24494 October 30, 2013 at 9:45 am
Last Post: orogenicman



Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)