(May 3, 2013 at 9:03 am)Drich Wrote:(May 2, 2013 at 10:54 pm)Ryantology Wrote: Just because our understanding doesn't agree with yours doesn't mean it is in error.
The way "our" reason was in error in this case was because popeye defaulted to Logical Fallacies to push the conversation past, a critical comperhension failure of the God of the bible he could not reconcile resulting in 'an appeal to common sense/Divine fallacy.'
This is somehow more erroneous than suggesting that your interpretation of the Bible is more correct that someone else's?
Quote:Speaking of the God of the bible in a way that differs from how the bible describes Him is a failure the basic understanding of God.
The Bible describes him as a vain, petty, psychopathic monster who screams for blood when angered, who invents a hell with which he can punish anyone who doesn't do what he wants and designs the system so that only by begging him for forgiveness can you avoid this fate. When a Christian insists that God is kind, loving and merciful, that is a basic misunderstanding of God.
Quote:My assessment stands.
Your assessment stands no higher than anyone else's.