RE: If Not Hell then what?
May 5, 2013 at 6:46 pm
(This post was last modified: May 5, 2013 at 6:55 pm by Drich.)
(May 3, 2013 at 12:48 pm)Texas Sailor Wrote: Don't hold your breath. All you get from this guy is a bunch of absurd claims that he doesn't care to back up with anything other than the bible told him it was true.
What else do you want? Would a trip to hell Help quench your hunger and thirst for 'proof?'
(May 3, 2013 at 9:39 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:This has been suggested several times. To which I ask, what if the process of Annihilation was to be consumed by the 'fires of Hell?' Is annihilation still what you want?(April 18, 2013 at 10:06 am)Drich Wrote: If you believe Hell to be immoral or just plain wrong, then what would you suggest God do with those who do not want to serve Him for eternity?
Annihilate their souls. Boom. They're out of His hair, and there's no conflict between the Justice of God and the Injustice inherent in sending someone to be tortured for eternity.
(May 3, 2013 at 10:31 pm)whateverist Wrote:God never makes the claim that He is 'Omni-benevolent.' The Church leaders who came up with this 'doctrine' had to over look a whole heck of a lot of scripture to force this attribute onto God.(May 3, 2013 at 9:39 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: Annihilate their souls. Boom. They're out of His hair, and there's no conflict between the Justice of God and the Injustice inherent in sending someone to be tortured for eternity.
We'll find out how omni-benevolent this god really is when He decides how to dispose of us. Will he look for a humane means of extermination? Will he just go for expedience or will he look to rub salt in the wounds. The whole idea of hell sounds more like the last alternative.