(May 15, 2013 at 12:37 pm)NoraBrimstone Wrote: You are so lacking in morals that the only reason you aren't running around harming others is because you're worried about getting caught? You know that means you're a Sociopath, right?No, I don't base my morality on logic, which is precisely why I wouldn't murder or rape anyone, even if I had the chance to get away with it scot-free. On the other hand, the more rational option would be to actually kill and rape if there's little to no retaliation, which probably explains why the Soviet Atheists raped their way through Eastern Europe to Germany. They probably committed more war crimes than Germany in all honesty, it's at least a close call. The difference is that the Soviets could not get punished for it. Even when the Germans sent a letter to Roosevelt demanding an investigation into Soviet massacres and mass rapes, he turned a blind eye. Why do you think what the Soviets did wasn't rational? It was. But was it moral, no it wasn't. Using Child soldiers in Africa is rational, yes, but not moral. And so is using rape as a weapon of war.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 18, 2025, 5:09 pm
Thread Rating:
are vegetarians more ethical by not eating meat?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)