(May 14, 2013 at 8:58 am)enrico Wrote: You say..........my brain......my eyes.......
It is like to say.......my car.......my vehicle that I use to survive and prosper.
In other words is just how i said, the brain and eyes are not the real you.
You are confusing the driver with the vehicle.
What if the vehicle is the driver? To separate the two concepts is to say that the one can exist independently of the other. Until you demonstrate that this is a true representation of reality, all the rest is pure fantasising.
(May 14, 2013 at 8:58 am)enrico Wrote: To be connected for a lifetime mean absolutely nothing.
On the contrary, it means a lifetime of experiences and hopes and dreams. Put another way, life. The only one we can possibly know for certain that we're going to get.
(May 14, 2013 at 8:58 am)enrico Wrote: It is like when you enter a car for a period of time and then get out at the end of a run.
Really? What then? Do we get to drive another vehicle? In fact, what's to stop us from switching vehicles whenever we feel like it, à la Grand Theft Human?
(May 14, 2013 at 8:58 am)enrico Wrote: Stimbo write.............What the fuck is "intuitional science"?
http://atheistforums.org/thread-18616-page-2.html
Well, bugger me sideways, I used a colourful English interjection!
However, I reiterate:
Quote:When you can point to a single example where I have used expletives purely as a means to make a point, i.e. without provocation or duress, then you may cast stones, angelface.
(Bolded for your viewing convenience). In your example I was provoked into irritation by some random idiot whose name escapes me for the moment.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'