(May 19, 2013 at 9:09 am)littleendian Wrote: Category error, we're not talking about the physical capacity to kill animals, we're talking about its moral justification or lack thereof. This kind of reasoning has been repeatedly refuted, even within this very thread.Now there's a false anaolgy if ever there was one. Rape=harmful. Meat=harmless.
Let me illustrate the fallacy: Men are often physically stronger than women. From your logic above it would follow that men are not acting immorally if they rape women because they have the biological capacity to.
I believe that's what a scientist would call bullshit.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 6, 2024, 11:31 am
Thread Rating:
are vegetarians more ethical by not eating meat?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)