I find it interesting that every time I bring up the problems surrounding the Council of Nicea, I'm met with the sound of crickets and a quick change of subject... I've inquired about these issues and problems for nigh on two decades now... With no refutations or comments.
Seriously, I want to know the counter argument/s. I don't think so highly of myself as to believe I'm the first person to have realized these problems.
As far as I can tell, if the foundation of the bible is faulty, there's no point in discussing what it actually contains, as it can simply be dismissed out-of-hand as a fallacious book.
Seriously, I want to know the counter argument/s. I don't think so highly of myself as to believe I'm the first person to have realized these problems.
As far as I can tell, if the foundation of the bible is faulty, there's no point in discussing what it actually contains, as it can simply be dismissed out-of-hand as a fallacious book.
