Refuting Evolution

[Esquilax]

You really brain washed totally!!!!!!!!!!

Yes, there are some non-beneficial (as we think) mutations
My idea is not denying them.

It is all about statistics
If we assume non-intelligence
There is no way for evolution to know the future, so many non-sense development must exist in all species (in Fossils and even now)
The ratio between non-beneficial and beneficial must be astronomical

Giraffe necks have nerves that loop around from the base to the head and back again, rather than taking the straight route. Dogs have no color vision. There's a kind of goat that, upon being panicked, completely freezes up and falls over. When bees sting, they die. Dogs have dewclaws that are easily damaged. Colossal Squids have donut shaped brains, and their esophagus runs through the center of it; if they swallow something bigger than the hole, they can get brain damage.

I can keep going, if you like?

My contention is two pronged. One: you haven't demonstrated that an unguided evolutionary process would entail a multitude of non beneficial or harmful mutations, you've just asserted it. Science fail one.

Two: insofar as I accept your premise to be true, there are actually tons of documented non-beneficial and harmful mutations out there. You just haven't bothered to do any research, and beyond that, since you've neglected to name an upper limit of what you'd accept as a sufficient number, you're free to just keep moving the goalposts back to an "astronomical" number, over and over again, no matter how much real evidence you're presented with.

You're being dishonest, from top to bottom.