RE: Mind/matter duality
May 29, 2013 at 5:58 pm
(This post was last modified: May 29, 2013 at 6:05 pm by bennyboy.)
(May 29, 2013 at 3:46 pm)Baalzebutt Wrote:Nobody yet has explained why a machine that functions exactly like the brain, but without subjective awareness, couldn't perform all the same evolutionary functions. Chemistry is chemistry with or without consciousness. Electric signals are electric signals with or without consciousness. The contraction of muscles is the contraction of muscles with or without consciousness. DNA is DNA with or without consciousness.(May 29, 2013 at 9:13 am)bennyboy Wrote: The question isn't the link between the brain and mind-- it's why a purely physical process ends up manifesting as conscious awareness at all-- rather than just grinding through its chemical calculations with no experience of itself. Is this really a property of the brain, or is it a property of complexity of information, or is it that mind is actually ingrained into the fabric of the universe?
Your failure is assuming that consiouness is somehow special. While I don't know HOW it works or WHY our brains produce conciousness, I do know that it is a result of physical processes in our brains.
You seem to be tied to the belief that there is some strange phenomenon that imparts self awareness to human (and several other species) brains. All I am saying is that conciousness seems to be a product of the functioning brain, not something extra like a blob of whipped cream on a sundae.
I am as interested in you in finding out why and how. I just can't allow myself to believe that conciousness is anything particularly special from a biological standpoint.
As I said in my first post, I think it is the result (or by product, if you will) of our evolutionarily developed brain. It serves a biological purpose. It helps us survive and thrive.
There are two possibilities:
1) The physics of humanity would function exactly the same without consciousness. In this case, the evolution of consciousness would be pointless-- all the genetic interactions with the environment would have deterministically led to non-aware beings that function exactly as we do. There's no "need" for an actual sense of awareness.
2) Consciousness adds something to our genetic fitness that goes beyond the pure physics of the body. In this case, whether it's dependent on brain structures is irrelevant-- consciousness is an extra layer that transcends the pure mechanics of the human body (including brain function).
I think assuming that because the brain is a precondition of mind, therefore the mind is a happenstance coincidence of brain function, is likely wrong. There has to be a reason why we are aware, rather than not, and "just because" is a patently unsatisfying answer.
(May 29, 2013 at 9:22 am)little_monkey Wrote:(May 28, 2013 at 5:33 pm)bennyboy Wrote: Why is there subjective awareness, in a universe which is supposedly composed only of physical interactions? Why shouldn't even human beings be able to take in data, process it, and output a behavior, without ever actually experiencing this process?
You realize that all living things do that, including the most primitive forms such as viruses and bacteria - they all process data from their environment, in various degrees. Humans have the extra ability to do one more step: invent symbols ( alphabet & numbers) to describe the world. After over "100,000 years" of homo sapiens appearing on this planet (that number gets to be bigger over time), we've only began to understand atoms and cells in the last 100 years. So there's plenty of room to increase our understanding.
Joe
This is part of the problem. We cannot know to what degree various organisms actually experience their world as we do, rather than just being organic machines.
My personal belief is that consciousness scales with the complexity of data-processing an organism can do, which you also seem to be implying. However, is there an "atomic" consciousness which is irreducible and still organic (requiring at least 1 nerve for example), or is it possible that on a primitive level, a kind of basic "awareness" exists where ANY two particles are brought into a relation with each other-- say by a chemical bond, or by gravity?
In the latter case, then there is an intrinsic dualism between information and awareness. This wouldn't surprise me, because now we have spacetime, and wave-particles. Why not wave-particle-mind? This would fit in with some of the QM experiments.