(May 30, 2013 at 5:55 am)Esquilax Wrote:(May 30, 2013 at 5:13 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote: One of our better Newspapers
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-e...6603461335
http://science.howstuffworks.com/science...iverse.htm
http://phys.org/news/2010-12-scientists-...erses.html
Doesn't that count as evidence, though?
That's the problem with this "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" schtick: how you you ascertain a thing exists without evidence?
I think the difference between 'theoretical underpinnings [whether proven or not] and 'I don't know thus x' needs to be stressed.





![[Image: 146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i629.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fuu13%2FRXM843%2F146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif)