RE: Mind/matter duality
May 31, 2013 at 3:53 am
(This post was last modified: May 31, 2013 at 4:08 am by bennyboy.)
(May 31, 2013 at 1:30 am)whatever76 Wrote:(May 28, 2013 at 5:33 pm)bennyboy Wrote: Why is there subjective awareness, in a universe which is supposedly composed only of physical interactions? Why shouldn't even human beings be able to take in data, process it, and output a behavior, without ever actually experiencing this process?
My answer would be because it is to our advantage to have subjective awareness in a world composed of physical interactions. The advantage that it gives us is the ability to adapt the environment to meet our biological imperatives.
Having data collected together, storing patterns in the brain to assist with later processing, having parallel modules working together, and having parts of that system mediated by some behaviors that are hard-coded in the DNA, are all useful. These are the things the brain can be observed to be doing in response to the environment.
Nobody yet has explained why there has to be a sentient entity who is experiencing all these processes in the way that I do, and that presumably all animals do to varying degrees.
In short, I totally agree with you. But as nice a story as it is, it's missing two important parts: the ability to prove it objectively, and a good explanation why experience > pure mechanical function. (by which I only mean brain function that doesn't involve conscious awareness)
(May 31, 2013 at 12:01 am)cato123 Wrote:I should probably be looking for the "block" button, because in my experience a little swearing is likely to lead to a whole lot of swearing and flaming, but since I'm the new guy I'll try my best to play nice.(May 30, 2013 at 11:42 pm)bennyboy Wrote: Okay. Assertion: consciousness evolved because it provides an advantage to fitness that a non-conscious mechanism could not. Evidence: ???
What the fuck? You make an assertion and beg of me evidence? How the fuck does that work?
You're a hopeless idiot or this is some kind of mental masturbation foreplay.
You say I'm making assertions, but when the assertion is that an existing model is inadequate, then it comes down to the BOP hot-potato game: "No, you take it. No YOU!" When I say in a purely physical model, no subjective awareness should be required to take in data, process, and output a behavior, it's because I'm addressing the idea of physical monism-- a purely determinist model in which mind and free will have no actual effect on outcomes, because they are at best illusory byproducts supervenient on brain chemistry or information processing.
No other machine that we know of requires subjective awareness in able to perform its job. We don't believe that computers are aware of data being transmitted along circuits. We don't believe that galaxies are aware of the interactions of the various solar systems and other entities exchanging energy within them.
IF the brain is just an organization of matter exchanging electrons, transmitting and receiving photons, etc. then you'll have to explain what's so special about humanity that it spawns completely new properties in a universe infinitely more complex than we can know.
This smacks of anthropocentrism, and also of religion: we are special because some magical property has been breathed into us and only us.
I'm not religious enough to believe that.