Refuting Evolution

[Muslim Scholar]

So you knew the human body isn't symmetrical really (of course there's variations, yet more testament to this being a natural process and not having a designer behind it!) and yet you still claimed it was when it was convenient. Yet more dishonesty, I see. And yet, apparently, you can't see that this runs contrary to your own stance...

Do you mean that the grooves inside your ears or your fingerprints patterns will make a difference in your survival if it was asymmetric

A beautiful form... when just a post ago you were claiming symmetry is beautiful, and yet above you admit that some asymmetry is present... God you're dumb.

Yes it is beautiful from outside, but who cares from inside?

---

Ahem. I give you one of the most common lifeforms on the planet:



Not a lot of symmetry there. Clue - symmetry is not a terrific indication as to whether or not a fuzzy sky daddy exists.

The example conforms my theory not refutes it
The existence of symmetrical species proves that it is a matter of beauty
Because God selected those species to be like that
while asymmetrical shape is not an obstacle against survival.

Wait............... I may be wrong
If you have an asymmetrical shape you will be considered ugly from female point of view and would not get many chances of sex, then your offspring will distinct quickly

---

Like my webbed toes or red hair? If a mutation is detrimental It wouldn't last generations, some minor mutations will.

I mean total nonsense, for example fish with a third leg on their back, you claim that fins started to grow into legs, why only the two bottom ones?
For many generations they will have no advantages till they are really functional, natural selection doesn't predict the future, so we should find fish with a third leg on their backs, or incomplete third eye that never developed into real eyes, etc.

How do you make that out ?????? The type of gross mutation you seem to be thinking of is rare, and the chances of finding such an INDIVIDUAL in the fossil record remote in the extreme.

They should exist in all forms and almost in all fossil record that we find, actually non-existence of many mutations in most of the species is a proof of intelligence by itself another proof is that most mutations doesn't go to offspring.

---

Mads HOX/BOX handles pattern formation (in plantae and animalia, for example). Symmetry in life is a matter of division. The way it works is that one cell becomes 2. 2 become 4 - and so on. All complex pattern formation is built upon this simple scheme and so it's no surprise to find symmetrical - even legged (for example) things all over the place. Even in the case of non-legged things growth occurs bi-directionally, plants don't "grow up from the roots" they grow up -and-down. Even here, when we see asymmetry in action between roots and shoots the process itself enjoys symmetry in mechanics.

You cannot have it both ways!

If the process is symmetrical, every thing will be
It cannot explain the asymmetrical organs and also cannot explain which part is grown to fit its purpose against symmetry.