(November 28, 2008 at 2:51 pm)Psalm 23 Wrote:(November 28, 2008 at 2:47 pm)leo-rcc Wrote: You are confusing atheism with anti-theism. I am not turning against anything, I just don't believe such a thing as a god exists. Certainly not the biblical one.anti-theism? Hmmm.. maybe you're right. However, you say, "Not the Biblical one," that is an unsure statement.
Hey if a god or gods do exist, proving it would convince me. However of all the gods ever described anywhere, the biblical one is the most unlikely to me.
(November 28, 2008 at 2:51 pm)Psalm 23 Wrote: Trust me, I would love to prove God exists to you... Just as much as you would love to disprove God.
I thank you not to presume what I would like to do. I dare you to find a single message on any board trying me to convince anyone of the non-existence of a god. I am not into that, never have.
(November 28, 2008 at 2:51 pm)Psalm 23 Wrote: I certainly wouldn't call Pacal's wager a judgement. It's more like a concern.
I call it a threat.
(November 28, 2008 at 2:51 pm)Psalm 23 Wrote:Quote:And I do not believe for a second moral laws are passed on from any deity. Morality is in everyone of us that wants to partake into a society, no god is needed for that.I'm not so sure. If you can provide evidence of ancient scripture with the same moral laws, then I would love to see them.
Whether it is written down somewhere is not the issue. Can you show how any of the moral laws couldn't have been conceived in a non-theological society? Can you show me one of those laws couldn't possibly be thought of by common reasoning?
Just because it is in some old text doesn't prove any divine intervention dictating it.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
