(June 1, 2013 at 5:52 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote:(May 29, 2013 at 4:06 am)orogenicman Wrote: Ahem. I give you one of the most common lifeforms on the planet:The example conforms my theory not refutes it
Not a lot of symmetry there. Clue - symmetry is not a terrific indication as to whether or not a fuzzy sky daddy exists.
The existence of symmetrical species proves that it is a matter of beauty
Because God selected those species to be like that
while asymmetrical shape is not an obstacle against survival.
Wait............... I may be wrong
If you have an asymmetrical shape you will be considered ugly from female point of view and would not get many chances of sex, then your offspring will distinct quickly
Yes, you are completely wrong. Symmetry may have the subjective quality of beauty to us human beings, but it is irrelevant to the question of the existence of a fuzzy sky daddy.
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero
