(December 14, 2009 at 9:50 pm)Pippy Wrote: I knew I should have looked that one up, I took stern out of context. He didn't say Rape.
"Stern's comments on April 21, 1999, a day after the Columbine High School massacre in Littleton, Colorado, drew angry criticism regarding the incident with the following comments: "There were some really good looking girls running out with their hands over their heads...Did [the suspects] try to have sex with any of the good looking girls? They didn't even do that?...At least if you are going to kill yourself and kill all the kids, why wouldn't you have some sex?...If I was going to kill some people, I'd take them out with sex.[75] Hundreds complained to KXPK, the show's Denver affiliate.[76] Stern did not issue an apology, arguing that his quotes were taken out of context.
From Wiki, so it has to be true.
It's not that I have my head up my ass, I have read and watched everything I could about the 2001 terror attacks. And no, not only conspiracy theory bullshit, but all of it. The Commission report, normal Americans perspectives. You are free to believe anything that has a wiki page must be absolutely true, but I would suggest that you guys do some research into America in the 21st century, and the foreign policy directives in the middle east. Look at the big picture, and be properly skeptical.
You can think that it all went down the way you were told, but that isn't very intelligent of you, since we are both believers in conspiracies. Mine is that a small group within the government staged a false-flag attack to further the same agenda that happened to be outlined in Cheney's PNAC (and the CFR, where I showed a while ago that Obama hand picked his administration). They planned on a 21st century of "full spectrum dominance", and this is how they are achieving it. The question is which conspiracy is more realistic, an invisible man in a cave being able to stand down NORAD, or something more sinister?
There, I am a 9/11 truther, bring on the name calling. But realize that my stance is that we are being lied to, and I have proven that, and can prove it again and again and again. So disagree, but know that it is a losing battle, as it is a fact that the investigation included clear untruths. I am not sure what happened, but I know what did not.
Gosh, I shouldn't let you guys get me going. But it's annoying that I can watch people be so foolish. It's right in front of you, and you won't look at it because of the implications it would mean for you world view.
Then again, these are the same people impressed by Dawkins work on theology, so it is a crowd that has been shown to be cowed. Not the best free thinkers we've got.
There, I didn't want to get into it again... Believe that buildings fall down after an hour and a half of kerosene fires. That what gets me, it at the base it is elementary physics (don't tell that to popular mechanics).
I should have just smiled, and not get drug into this. David Rovics said it best, "Is this the latest Lusitania, or another Reichstag fire?". Very apt.
thanks,
-Pip
Hey pippy, i've never had a real discussion about 911, you want to present your evidence?
.
