but Jaques Fresco is kinda a futurist himself...
Didn't you even like the first third about astrological worship being superimposed onto religion? I thought you guys might like anything that made Jesus less likely.
Okay, one fact Void. They didn't find any of the four "black boxes" in the WTC debris, even though I have not been able to find any other literature involving the failure to find the flight data recorder. They found it for TWA800, in the ocean. Now couple that with the supposed witness accounts of people aiding the FBI in the recovery. Is it more likley that those devices were not found, which seems statistically improbable at the least, and that the alleged witnesses are lying, or that they did find them and the FBI are lying?
All I am saying as a truther is that I can prove the existence of lies in the official story, not make theories as to what did happen. I will theorize, if it is constructive, but I would rather try to demonstrate that there are places in the official story that the information doesn't add up.
If you are interested in physics, that it seems strange to me that you of all people would accept the "pancake collapse" theory, as it has no bearing on the reality we all witnessed. I mean that is Newtonian basics.
I have seen Zeitgeist, yes Tammy. It was interesting, but I do not agree that we need to wait for tech to solve all of our problems. But they did a good job of summarizing and questioning the Commissions story. But I don't base my beliefs on it, it's just another video.
So there, have a tidbit of fact about 9/11, but seriously look into it yourself. I agree that there is a lot of BS out there. Start with the Commission report, but it is a long book. See what the official story is, and then begin the process of skeptical evaluation of evidence.
Thanks,
-Pip
Didn't you even like the first third about astrological worship being superimposed onto religion? I thought you guys might like anything that made Jesus less likely.
Okay, one fact Void. They didn't find any of the four "black boxes" in the WTC debris, even though I have not been able to find any other literature involving the failure to find the flight data recorder. They found it for TWA800, in the ocean. Now couple that with the supposed witness accounts of people aiding the FBI in the recovery. Is it more likley that those devices were not found, which seems statistically improbable at the least, and that the alleged witnesses are lying, or that they did find them and the FBI are lying?
All I am saying as a truther is that I can prove the existence of lies in the official story, not make theories as to what did happen. I will theorize, if it is constructive, but I would rather try to demonstrate that there are places in the official story that the information doesn't add up.
If you are interested in physics, that it seems strange to me that you of all people would accept the "pancake collapse" theory, as it has no bearing on the reality we all witnessed. I mean that is Newtonian basics.
I have seen Zeitgeist, yes Tammy. It was interesting, but I do not agree that we need to wait for tech to solve all of our problems. But they did a good job of summarizing and questioning the Commissions story. But I don't base my beliefs on it, it's just another video.
Quote:Paranoid Schizophrenia?That's the easy way out...
Quote:Mankind has some problems that's for sure, but you only need emotion and greed to explain all of thatI would disagree, I don't think human nature is inherently evil. I think it is simpler but larger than just greed and emotion, that they are symptoms, not the problem itself...
So there, have a tidbit of fact about 9/11, but seriously look into it yourself. I agree that there is a lot of BS out there. Start with the Commission report, but it is a long book. See what the official story is, and then begin the process of skeptical evaluation of evidence.
Thanks,
-Pip
